Psychic Self-Defense in Multiple Relationship Domains

psychic domains

Important preliminary point: People’s minds do not operate on their own, but in network. Our intellectual life takes place in a network that involves multiple intelligences (human being in physical and non-physical forms) in vibrational resonance. We are constantly surrounded and interacting with other intelligences that harmonize with us at some level. They are drawn to us due to common interests, desires, experiences, ties from the past, etc. The invisible world exerts significant influence upon us, good and bad. So common is this influence that we can say we are all mediums, just in different degrees of awareness and intensity of the phenomena. Our virtues, good intentions and efforts in a moral path connect us with intelligences aligned with such energies. Our vices, evil inclinations, flaws of character and rebellious behavior connect us with intelligences that align with such vibrations and allow them to influence us. Therefore, the most important aspect of our spiritual practice is in the moral realm (and any spiritual practice devoid of a moralizing factor can be considered dead and flawed). This is why Jesus advised us to “love our neighbor as we love ourselves”. The depth of such statement can’t be summarized in a few words, but we’d like to highlight the following aspects: 1. Know yourself. 2. Strive to love yourself to your highest potential. 3.  Because you love yourself, strive to rid yourself from all flaws of character you identify within yourself. 4. Love all other God’s creations to the limit of your ability.

“459. Do spirits influence our thoughts and actions? ‘They often direct both; their influence is greater than you suppose, for very frequently it is they who guide you.’ ” [1]

If the elements covered above are clear to you, we can now proceed to exploring our relationship with non-physical intelligences to a higher degree. Where do they come from?  How can they help or harm? How their influence fit in the perspective of inner reform, awakening to a spiritual life and contribution to the development of Earth?

Life exposes us to multiple forms of relationships. Relationships are critical to our development as each person with whom we interact work as a mirror of ourselves. In this sense, healthy relationships reflect our internal harmony and unhealthy relationships reflect our internal conflicts and dissatisfactions. While we are influenced by all relationships to some degree, some of them receive more of our own energy, dedication, time, etc. Our level of involvement, intimacy, vested interest and exposure naturally provide them a characteristic and proportional psychic intensity (strength, lasting effect, probability and nature of multiple psychic influences). In other words, where we spend most of our energy and time is also where we are probably most exposed to psychic influences and where those influences maintain the stronger and more lasting connection with us (psychic intensity). The nature of such influences will depend on our moral inclinations and the direction we give to our though and will – good or bad.

For instance, consider our life in society. We are influenced by our culture, customs, language, etc. In the society where we express ourselves, we have a good idea of what is accepted, rejected, supported or disdained in multiple situations. In many situations, however, we might feel like we don’t really need to care about people’s opinions regarding what we do or think. This is a clear indication that the societal domain typically has a low psychic intensity. Unless we gather their contact information, we might not re-encounter someone we talked to at a park or in a leisurely day at the beach. This is the same from an invisible perspective, so that most likely the intelligences (incarnated or discarnate) we interact with today in the societal relationship domain won’t be seen again tomorrow or ever. Relationships in the societal domain can be described as casual.

“Question 767. Is absolute isolation contrary to the law of nature? ‘Yes, since man instinctively seeks society, and since all men are intended to help forward the work of progress by aiding one another.’

Question 770. What is to be thought of those who live in absolute seclusion in order to escape the pernicious contact of the world? ‘The life of such persons is doubly selfish. In avoiding one evil, they fall into another, since they forget the law of love and charity.’” [1]

Now, consider our professional environment. This is already a much different relationship domain, with stronger psychic strength. In the professional domain, we are typically expected to attend specific physical locations where work takes place and interact regularly with the individuals whom are there. Because of the higher frequency of interaction, time of exposure, vested interest and energy spent in this environment, the relationships we maintain in this domain have a much stronger influence and impact over our psyche. We are more careful on our approach in this domain. Things we just wouldn’t care about in a societal relationship domain, when affecting the professional relationship domain might matter a lot more! For instance, some people might not care about screaming at someone in a traffic jam or being disrespectful somehow – but if we then learn that the person we interacted with is a co-worker, then things get a little different, isn’t it? Some people here in Oregon, for instance, enjoy attending to nudist sites. But how does it sound bumping into a co-worker there? Yeah, chances are it is not that cool! So, if we are clear about those two domains, let’s insert a new one into this picture. Let’s call it friendship circles. In this domain, relationships start getting more personal. We might not spend the same time we do at work with friends, but friends are people we get to know more intimately and that know us more deeply too. We typically have something in common with our true friends. In other words, we are in energetic or vibratory resonance with them – and naturally might harmonize with their invisible influences too. We are more opened to being ourselves around friends. In a professional setting, people are typically careful about the ideas and opinions shared. Among frinds, this is remarkably different. The emotional connection in this relationship domain is stronger, promoting an environment of safety and trust.

Continuing the logic developed thus far, we can now explore the relationship domain here described as the extended family. This domain is composed of those individuals connected by ties of family but that do not participate on the same household. We can change country, state, city, address. We can change jobs and friends, but family will always be family. It is true that the psychic intensity maintain with certain family members might not be as strong as perhaps some of a professional nature, but if a regular relationship is maintained, then there is a lasting factor of the family bonds that shouldn’t be neglected. In any case, the central point we are developing in this text is that different relationships have different psychic intensities. The relationship domains explored here are not supposed to be applicable in all case, but just theoretical frames of references that allow us to understand the logic of spiritual influences. The final relationship domains we’d like to note are the conjugal life and our relationship with ourselves. None of the former relationship domains noted here have the intensity, the lasting factor, the depth of intimacy and the demand of love and moral virtues observed in the conjugal life (assuming this relationship is taken seriously by the partners, of course). But if love partners have a deep bond established among them, no relationship can be as profound as that we have with ourselves. This is why most psychic influences happens within and affect our household environment and our relationship with ourselves – therefore the importance of knowing ourselves cannot be underestimated.

We hope that at this point it is abundantly clear that the multiple relationship domains we maintain have different levels of psychic intensity according to their own nature. This means, we are more likely to suffer spiritual obsessions (or spiritual attacks) coming from our family circles than from that leisurely day at the beach. This also means we will have more conflicts coming from our family circles that from that leisurely day at the beach… We should also not ignore such conflicts and simply focus on peacefully enjoying that leisurely day at the beach. Doing so would be a waste of time and an escape from the urgent need for inner reform. Remember, relationships are mirrors of ourselves and conflicts that are painful to us typically indicate something we have to revise within ourselves. But, just in case, let’s be a little clearer on this point. We are not instigating you to pick fights and engage in conflict. We are simply suggesting that our spiritual development only takes place when we successfully manage the conflicts within them – with love and maturity. A spiritually developed person is only that who can bring peace where there was anger and warmongering; hope where there was only despair and delusion, and light where a blinding darkness prevailed.

In a previous post from our site (“What is the measure of your spiritual wisdom?”), it was mentioned that the measure of our spiritual development is related to the quality and impact of our influence in the environments with which we engage. This influence takes place in all of those relationship domains. So what is your ability to make peace by inspiring others? What is your qualification to manage discordance with empathy, love and honesty? How much light do you bring to the multiple relationship domains you maintain? Are you inspired by a network of intelligences working for the common good of the cosmos or those that simply inspire you to do whatever is best for your own self-interest? Are you defending privileges or promoting a world of freedom and equal access to opportunities?

In order to develop adequate psychic self-defense, it is critical that we understand our personal goals in each of those domains. Where are we doing well, where are we failing. What do we want to achieve in each of them, and why. What to watch for and how/when to contribute. Start with your relationship with yourself and work your thoughts up to your relationship with your spouse, family, workplace and society. Remember that a consequence of operating in a network means that if we don’t know what we want, defend and care about – then other intelligences will fill the void. Therefore, it all starts by knowing who we are and what we stand for. If we don’t have a working compass for our relationship with ourselves, then most likely our other relationship domains won’t be functional either.

If we trust the spiritual realm has plans to bring peace and order to our world, than know that we are right, but they depend on human hands – which actually live in this world to do the job. They do this by inspiring those of us who want to learn to face conflict and transform ourselves. They understand that external changes can only be a natural consequence of internal reforms (see our post “Inner light to a brighter future”). We are their mediums, all of us who seek to change and make change. But, more than ask for change, we must be the change we want to see. Be the change, not forgetting that it starts with us, our relationships with those who are most dear to us, and so on… before impacting the whole of society. So, again, what positive impact are you making to yourself? How about your spouse or significant other? Family? Friends? Are you contributing to their development? Are you learning with your conflicts in those relationship realms? Are you inclined to peace, love, freedom, trust and good on them? Or you seek to dominate, dictate what’s right and wrong, acceptable or not, expected or not. Are you coherent with what you defend? Are your actions coherent with your speech and is your speech coherent with your mind? Are your head and hands occupied? Do you ONLY and ALWAYS employ words for good? How malicious and futile is your mouth? Do you fear silence and need to find ways to distract your mind (with alcohol, narcotic drugs, loud music, work stuff, sports, etc.)? Do you demand from others more than from yourself? Do you suppose the annoyances from others only indicate changes they need to make? Do you take others as ungrateful or evil? Are you easily influenced by money, power, fame or the need for appreciation and recognition? One more: do you know who you are and what you stand for? The following section has been extracted from The Gospel According to Spiritism, from Allan Kardec for being a remarkable good reference for moral development and psychic self-defense. Peace, love and much work to all!

 

Moral Persons [2]

Truly moral persons are those who practice the law of justice, love and charity in its greatest purity. If they question their conscience about their actions, they ask themselves if they have violated this law; if they have done any evil; if they have done all the good they could; if they have willingly disregarded any opportunity to be useful; if anyone might have a complaint about them; and, finally, if they have done unto others everything they would like to have done unto themselves.

They have faith in God, and in God’s goodness, justice and wisdom. They know that nothing happens without God’s permission, so they submit to the Divine Will in everything.

They have faith in the future; thus, they place spiritual possessions above temporal ones.

They know that all the vicissitudes of life, all its sorrows and all its disappointments are trials or expiations, and they accept them without complaining.

Persons imbued with the sentiment of charity and love for their neighbor do the good for its own sake without expecting anything in return, and they repay evil with good, defend the weak against the strong and always sacrifice their own interests to the interests of justice.

                They find their satisfaction in the benefits they spread around, the service they render, the happiness they promote, the tears they dry and the consolation they provide to the afflicted. Their first impulse is to think of others before thinking of themselves and to attend to the interests of others before their own. The selfish, on the other hand, calculate the profits and losses entailed in every generous act.

Moral persons are kind, humane and benevolent toward all regardless of race or creed, because they regard all people as their brothers and sisters.

They respect all sincere convictions that others might hold to and they do not anathematize those who do not think like they do.

In all circumstances charity is their guide; they tell themselves that those who harm others with malevolent words, who hurt others’ feelings with their pride and disdain, who do not recoil from the idea of causing suffering or difficulty, however slight, when it could be avoided, fail in their duty of love for their neighbor and do not deserve the Lord’s clemency.

They hold no hatred or rancor, or desire for vengeance. Following Jesus’ example, they forgive and forget offenses, and remember only good deeds, because they know that they will be forgiven according to how they themselves have forgiven.

They are indulgent toward others’ weaknesses, for they know that they themselves need indulgence, and they recall these words of Christ, “Let him who is without sin cast the first stone.”

They never take pleasure in searching for defects in others or in calling attention to them. If necessity forces them to do so, they always look for the good that might mitigate the evil.

They study their own imperfections and strive incessantly to combat them. All their efforts are focused on being able to say to themselves tomorrow that they are better than they were yesterday.

They do not seek to exalt their spirit or talents at the expense of others; instead, they seize every opportunity to point out what is praiseworthy in other people.

They do not gloat over their wealth or their personal advantages, for they know that everything that has been given to them can be taken away.

They use but do not abuse the possessions that have been accorded to them, for they know that they are a trust for which they will have to render an accounting, and that the worst use of them in regard to themselves would be to use them to satisfy their passions.

If the social order has placed others under their tutelage, they treat them with kindness and benevolence, because they are their equals before God. They use their authority to lift their morale and not to squash them with their pride. They avoid anything that could render their subordinates’ position more painful.

Those who are subordinate, on the other hand, understand the duties of their position and are scrupulous in consciously fulfilling them.

Finally, moral persons respect in their fellow beings all the rights arising from the laws of nature, in the same way they wish their own to be respected.

This is not a list of all the qualities that define moral persons, but whoever makes an effort to possess them is on the road that leads to all the others.

References

[1]: Kardec, Allan. The Spirits’ Book.

[2]: Kardec, Allan. The Gospel According to Spiritism.

Awakening for a Future Society

dawn-700x300

While philosophers such as Karl Marx imagined to reform the world through bloody class fights as to arrive at a new social structure, both Rousseau and Kant recognized that a renewed and better world could only come from a different and morally superior humankind, able to revert the state of submission of a vast majority of unprivileged men and women to a small elite. This exploration has been maintained since the beginning of civilization, thousands of years ago, and is to this date sustained by rigid social structures, political systems and religious doctrines. But how could (and can) this powerful and privileged minority keep the largest portion of the world’s population suffering in poverty and disgrace for so long?

The major religious traditions of the past were all founded on the concept of heteronomy (research this word!), as if god acted through punishments and rewards, and the principle of the degradation of souls – with obvious differences from religion to religion. For instance, Adam and Eve were reprehended for eating the forbidden fruit and punished with expulsion from heaven, conception with pain, mortality, etc.; transferring the original sin to all of their offspring. According to this tradition, to escape eternal condemnation, it is required to blindly surrender to god’s will. Those laws called divine are all external to the individual. In this conception, the greatest human virtue are obedience, loyalty and meekness; values that are conditionally maintained for fear of sin and condemnation. In many Eastern reincarnationist doctrines, the mythology is different, but the intrinsic values are mostly the same. In their narratives of traditional religious texts, the soul is originally good when conceived by god, but contaminates itself through multiple failures and errors made over a physical life. Such failures render the soul deserving of punishment through successive reincarnations as a plant, an animal, an insect, etc. depending on the severity of the crime.

But it wasn’t only the religious traditions that propagated the heteronomous moral. The materialist theories emerging on the 19th century abandoned mysticism and superstitions to some degree, but maintained the concept of heteronomy by keeping men submissive to the external laws of society – more precisely, the law of the survival of the fittest (also known as the might is right) determined by biologic and circumstantial differences. According to Auguste Comte, for example, the great masses of workers and all women didn’t have adequate brain development and were therefore organically prevented, by nature, to make adequate use of their intellectual faculties. They should therefore surrender to the command and dominance of the minority of men privileged with a better nervous system able to make them scientists, leaders, commanders, etc. Those sickly fantasies of the positivism of Comte were well accepted on his time and still persist in our present society even if disguised in other more modern and politically correct formats.

But what are the ideas that could revolutionize the world and build a better society? The Swiss philosopher and psychologist Jean Piaget can give us a clue. Piaget, studying the moral judgment of children, established an association between  – heteronomous morality, coercion and submission – and – autonomous morality, cooperation and mutual respect. According to Piaget, it is possible to apply to society this natural psychological process observed in children, fostering, generation after generation, a natural (although complex) change from coercion to solidarity; from a heteronomous morality to an autonomous morality. As he indicated, in conformist societies, where the population is vastly explored, coercion determine submission and passivity. Where freedom is embraced and promoted, fraternal attitude arises and the individual assume responsibility for the well-being of the collectivity (and vice-versa).

Now, if well understood, isn’t the autonomous morality the cornerstone of the original teachings of Jesus (before being manipulated and misrepresented over the centuries)? If you pay attention, words such as “you are gods”, “you can do all I can do and much more”, “I didn’t come to bring peace, but a sword” and “my kingdom is not of this world” doesn’t quite fit the merciful Jesus the churches sell you today. Indeed, if studying his words, as well as those of other morally distinguished men, it is possible to observe their moral autonomy, the presence of compassion but also a sense of unbreakable justice. Perhaps this is the last teaching the master of the Galilee left us before dying – do not surrender your will, your reason and your morals  to others. Socrates was arrested and murdered for being loyal to his moral values. Giordano Bruno was burned for not surrendering to the church’s authority. Countless examples of those luminaries that changed our world for better indicate the clear presence of an autonomous morality and freedom of thought. To bring a contemporary example (and I hope you agree with me), wasn’t Edward Snowden acting from a moral autonomous perspective when getting involved in the NSA spying scandal?

                Freedom of thought, acting morally according to the values of one’s own consciousness (even in detriment of self interests and independent of conventional rules and religions); this is the sign of the awakened man ready to build the society of the future. When we have enough of them, we will have a new world as the external projection of their moral and spiritual values. A sustainable future society invariably require individuals capable of mutual collaboration, founded from the autonomous fraternity they feel for each other. So, it is not through scientific development, economic growth, politics or wars that we will build a new society. It is through our own inner reform, arriving at a true and innate understanding of the law of love, preached by way too many and practiced by way too few, that we will be able to find peace and happiness. As noted Allan Kardec on his Posthumous Works, “The social matter doesn’t have, therefore, as a starting point the form of this or that institution; it is completely related to the moral betterment of individuals and their collectivities. There is where one can find the beginnings, the true key to the happiness of humankind. Because then, men will no longer conceive mutually harming each other. It is not enough to cover corruption with varnish, it is indispensable for it to be extinguished” (free translation).

If you enjoyed this post, keep up with us through our site and social media:
 http://www.oregonspiritistsociety.com 
https://www.facebook.com/OregonSpiritistSociety/.
Leave your comments below and feel free to ask us to write about any topic of your interest!

Boundary-less Spiritism and the Spiritual Practice of the New Millennia

p03xsw49

God is not adept of any religion. Nature, both physical and non-physical, is independent of our beliefs and opinions about it. Science and religion are only human interpretations of the laws that govern the universe and our relationship with it as individual consciousnesses. Every law of physics reflect an attempt to interpret the mechanisms of the four-dimensional (3 of space and 1 of time) physical universe, but doesn’t change those mechanisms themselves, neither explore their relation with other neglected dimensions. Similarly, every religion reflect an attempt to interpret the moral and intellectual laws that govern our connection with the creator and (perhaps) with the universe, but such mechanisms are also independent of our interpretations. This has very important consequences that are often ignored or even denied by our society; that is, we must be very careful not to fall into dogmatism.

Now, allow me a parenthesis before I continue discoursing about religion. This parenthesis is about the dogmatism of our sciences. I am not picking on sciences. The point is that when we talk about dogmatism, it is common for people to think it is only something applicable to religion. However, simply put, dogmatism is the imposition (moral or even physically) of a specific belief system as an unquestionable truth. So, when we think about science, we often think about the application of methods or research, checks and balances that guarantee trustworthy results, right? That’s why questioning science is typically a sign of ignorance, lack of education or both. Science can’t be questioned because it works with verifiable results. Well, it happens that as we go down this path we walk a fine line between exploration and dogmatism. For instance, does it follow that verifiable results must always be physical and positivist? In this case, should we even consider psychology and philosophy fields of science? What about all para-psychological phenomena (ESP, materialization,  telekinesis, etc.) which have already been demonstrated multiple (repeated) times under controlled conditions, by multiple people and everywhere in the globe.  Should we simply deny the veracity of observable phenomena as rulers of what is possible and what is not possible in the universe? Shouldn’t we question whether significant scientific advancements cannot be made through research in areas that, for their own non-material nature, cannot be researched through traditional positivist means? Does science really cannot accommodate any flexibility, any adaptability that proves to be adequate for the study of a given subject matter, or natural events happening in dimensions beyond the three-dimensional space and one-dimensional time? With so many signs that indicate the survival of consciousness after physical death, the reality of reincarnation, among others; should we really reject all studies in those areas? With science coming to the conclusion, through its own means, that the observer consciousness can affect the results of an experiment, that there is a non-local space-time reality (entanglement), that matter is just a condensed energy state, etc.; should we really marginalize those research fields likely to drive potential groundbreaking revolutions and place the burden of proving them right (to a large audience already convinced they are wrong) on anyone who with no funding or support decides to study them? Could this be one of the most disguised forms of dogmatism of our present society?

There is a difference between rejection and denial, the latter being the state of our sciences when opting not to honestly and unbiasedly research certain topics. Then, isn’t this denial evidencing a plain and simple dogmatism? Isn’t it what dogmatic people do, to deny anything different than their own viewpoints? Isn’t it a state of mind where anything opposed to a particular paradigm is ruled out? Dogmatism is a state where out of pride and selfishness we want the universe to function according to our own interpretations of it. Therefore, there is a particular way to connect with God, my way! There are particular natural phenomena that can be accepted; those which can currently be “naturally” explained. Anything else should be classified as paranormal, supernatural or simply charlatanism or delusion. Yet, as Allan Kardec, the codifier of Spiritism, pointed out over 150 years ago, if there is an effect, there must be a cause. The talk below from Rupert Sheldrake brilliantly and clearly demonstrates dogmatism in our sciences.

But, going back to religion, it is of utmost importance that we start freeing ourselves up from the boundaries of any particular paradigm for our connection with God and the universe. Every strict religious belief is dogmatic and restrictive by nature. All religions are a step in our spiritual journey towards perfection and communion with God, but at some point we must free our minds of any particular interpretation. A new consciousness level is achieved when we become genuine explorers of the truth, aware of our current inability to grasp all of the laws of the cosmos and operate at a level of perfection that is in full harmony with the divine love. In other words, Earth humanity will raise to a whole new consciousness level when it free itself up from the walls of religions; when it absorb the universal truths contained in every religion and rid them from everything else. Then, all of us will truly be one. We will not be connected by belief-systems or laws that promote mutual respect and good behavior; we will be connected by divine love. We will be immersed in a love that transcends this planet and connects us with God and all of its creation. We will be awake to what we truly are. Then, as Chico Xavier, one of the most remarkable mediums of recent times noted brilliantly in 1971, at the live Brazilian TV audience program Pinga Fogo, “(…) we will understand that we are part of a universal family”. Indeed, we will then understand the true meaning of the bible passage which notes that God’s kingdom has many dwellings (see John 14:2).

In our development process to this new consciousness level, the Spiritist science codified by Allan Kardec, offers a remarkable new paradigm for the study and practice of spirituality in this new millennia. As Kardec himself noted, “Spiritism is not a new religion as some people pretend it to be because they don’t know it, or a new sect that is formed by taking advantage of older ones. It is a purely moral Doctrine with no dogmas and that allows each person the entire freedom of religion since it imposes none. A demonstration of that is the fact that its most enthusiastic followers are among the most devoted Catholics as among Protestant, Jews and Muslims. Spiritism has never advised anyone to change religion or sacrifice their beliefs. It does not really belong to any religion or better still, it is present in all of them.” (Kardec, October of 1861)

The passage above indicates the framework for a conscious spiritual practice which I consider to be in high demand in our world nowadays. It is a framework of curious, unbiased and unpretentious exploration of our relationship with the divine and the universe.  It is critical that we forge adequate perspectives for the advancement of spiritualist sciences; one that do not create boundaries, but eliminate them; one that free our consciousness from the many incarnations in contact with dogmatic belief systems. As a free-thinker and admirer of the Spiritist sciences, among other spiritualist bodies of knowledge, I believe that it is time for us to understand the smallness of all of our religions. In a universe of trillions of stars, all of them with dozens of planets, it is fair for us to ask: how many religions are out there? Do they have a leader, a pope? Then how many popes are out there? Is there a single religion that actually got everything right? Where is it and how can we know? Our communion with ourselves and, in consequence, with our divine nature requires us to free ourselves from the boundaries of paradigms that cannot be confirmed by reason and felt within our hearts. I see a future where religions will be faced as a step in our history towards true spirituality. I see a future where the boundaries between our four-dimensional reality and other unknown time-space dimensions are finally overcome by many. It is with this vision in mind that I write this text inviting my reader to tap into all of the spiritual knowledge at our disposal. The knowledge contained by all religions of all times as well as that which we can access through further exploration. It is in such way that Spiritism becomes a special step for humanity. Rather than think about it as just another religion, we must deeply understand its purpose, from design to its current state, as an anchor for the birth of a renovated humanity in a renovated Earth. In the words of its founder, “Spiritism proclaims freedom of thought as a natural law; calls it to his followers, in the same way for everyone. It respects all sincere faiths and requests reciprocity. From freedom of thought derives the right to self-examination in matters of faith. Spiritism rejects any form of blind faith, because they require men to surrender their own reason; it considers rootless all faiths imposed: Unshakable faith is only one which can confront reason face to face in all epochs of humanity.” (Kardec, Posthumous Works)

We must then, allow it to grow as we grow with it. At the risk of chocking many, I see a future when all religions will be obsolete as we practice not religion, but a true spiritual communion and connection with all there is. I see a future when the word Spiritism will also be obsolete as we no longer need to protect its ideas from foreign ones (which was the initial intention of the neologism). This is because living true spiritual communion and connection with all there is, the truths brought by Spiritism will be known and practiced by all, beyond its boundaries. Could this be a framework for spiritual practice in the New Millennia? It is certain that time will show.

If you enjoyed this post, follow our page http://www.oregonspiritistsociety.com and social media (facebook for now): https://www.facebook.com/OregonSpiritistSociety/. Leave your comment below and feel free to ask us to write about any topic of your interest!

POINT #2: We are spiritual beings having an incarnated experience on earth, not living bodies having (or not) spiritual experiences.

multidimensional-light

For Point #1, click here!

This point #2 is all about perspective. Think about every person that stood out from the crowds for their moral values. We have had many of these personalities across all centuries and geographies, among which we can cite Aristotle, Plato, Jesus, Krishna, Buddha, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Chico Xavier among many others. Regardless of their religion or nationality, all of them sacrificed themselves at different degrees and created progress. Think about what it means and you will understand what distinguish them from ordinary people – which are us.

To a large extent, we still live our lives trapped on selfish patterns of behavior, ego-centrism and apathy towards others. We are concerned about what people think of us and how we can influence others, usually to our own benefit. If this does not apply to you, then congratulations, you are above Earth humanity average. Now, as a rule, those are the general consciousness level I typically observe (and that I consider responsible for making the world the way it is at the present time). In addition to what I mentioned above, I also observe that most people lack self-esteem and confidence. They live in fear of rejection and uncertainty of who they are. A simple example that demonstrates this point is the fact that most people take criticism very personally (as a personal attack that jeopardizes their integrity and honor) or are easily offended. This lack of self-esteem and confidence makes most people worry about their social status and comply with standards of living that are far from conducive to happiness. But the order of the day is not to cause commotion… just live your life, workday in workday out, spend a great deal of time, effort and financial resources purchasing things you were convinced to be a desperate need and continue unquestioning everything. Most people can’t see we’re trapped on the mindset that life is short and we must enjoy it. Live life fully, some say. Well, in my opinion, this is simply short-sighted. I will expand on this topic a great deal in a different text, when talking more specifically about ethics, or what I call cosmo-ethics. Here, however, we will focus on developing the point that we are spiritual beings, although we will not extinguish it yet.

Do you think the personalities mentioned in the first paragraph operate according to the paradigms noted on the second paragraph of this text? The answer is NO. Regardless of their nationality, religion, education, whatever… they have seen their lives from a different perspective. They used it to make changes in the world in detriment of their own pleasure. They operate not from a selfish, egocentric and fearful standpoint, but one of confidence, charity and universalism. Now this is perhaps the most important detail here – if you ask them, my guess is that they would tell you they have lived their lives fully – that you, reader, ponder about it and come to your own conclusions. For as harsh as it might have been, they enjoyed their life from a spiritual perspective, which provided them incredibly superior delight and comfort. They have effectively contributed to a better world. Note that for going against pre-established norms does not mean they have been anarchists, against all notions of order and common living. It simply means they would not bend their personal moral values and convictions for unjust norms of their society. In fact, being morally more evolved than their society in some regard, they have incited much needed reformations. They have reminded us that laws are designed to bring order and peace, but when they also bring injustice, changes are needed.

I have covered this difference in mindset between those we celebrate and honor as examples to be followed and ordinary people because this simple comparison might provide you some detachment from the illusion of reality created by our incarnated condition and limited senses. Some of us have already effected this detachment, although not changed our behavior. Others, not only realize our spiritual condition, but also are true to it on our daily lives – making positive changes in the world to the limit of our abilities. This does not depend on religion, because religious dogmas are also an illusion. We must realize that the more we awake to our true spiritual nature and are true to it, the more we practice the single and uniform religion of love.

If you are not as religious, maybe you believe in the power of intention, in setting your thought into motion, creating your own reality. The power of intention has gained significant momentum, at least in the United States, after the books and teachings of Ernst Holmes. Holmes teachings have been continued by many organizations and somewhat expanded and popularized through books such as Rhonda Byrne’s “The Secret”. People all over the United States, if not within the entire globe, are setting themselves up for “manifesting” things in their lives. Now, think about how the realization of our true nature and purpose in life are critical for the intentions and thoughts we create. We are spiritual beings having an incarnated experience on earth, not living bodies having, or not, spiritual experiences.

Think about the lifestyle of most of our society as I have described earlier in this chapter: Spending a great deal of time, effort and financial resources purchasing things that will grant us a certain status and social approval. Trapped on the mindset that life is short and we must enjoy it while there’s still time. Corrupting our moral values to different extents in order to conform to various forms of injustice. Rending ourselves to greed, prejudice, avarice, pride, anger and so many other vices. Now, think about what we are creating with our own thoughts! At this point, I should say that, regardless of whether or not you believe in the power of intention, your thoughts reverberate through the universe. Your thoughts are your identity in the cosmos; they reveal that you currently are without your temporary body, your true spiritual nature. With this in mind, think about how many times we are loyal to manifestations of “inferior” nature.

Speaking for myself, I see people trying to “manifest” (a word commonly used by some and meaning “consciously create”) those very same things that will provide them greater social status and comfort most of the time. They visualize mansions, whooping paychecks and all other sorts of material things. Accordingly, books align their messages to what most people want to hear: how to become a millionaire, how to prosper financially, etc. It seems that talking about “manifesting” peace, love or the end of war and hunger in the world does not sell very well. Meanwhile, despite all books, techniques and efforts, few achieve their desires and the great minority who could not “manifest” their objectives wonders what they are doing incorrectly – constantly reminding themselves that many have reached their goals. Now, let me say it again: We are spiritual beings having an incarnated experience on earth, not living bodies having, or not, spiritual experiences. Logic should tell us that if an approach isn’t working, maybe we should consider changes. But what should we change? My clue is… who is manifesting your soul or your personality? What is your soul and what does it desire? Does it extend beyond your conscious mind? If you like this point, read our post “Inner light to a brighter future” and wait for our point #3.

POINT #1: Nothing is supernatural. We simply haven’t grasped the universe in all of its perfection.

multidimensional

Who am I? Where do I come from? What am I doing here? Where will I go after? For centuries people have asked such questions which have never been fully answered. In fact, a good deal of people get busy with something else (supposedly more important) and give up trying to answer them or assume there just isn’t an answer. Others take pre-fabricated answers hinged on faith and dogmatism, often in contradiction to their own inner thoughts, intuition or logical reasoning. Only a few truly attempt to honestly answer those questions, trying to make sense of things through a rational and balanced analysis of what they know and what they feel based on their own experience as well as those of others. The fact is that we talk very little about those questions although they are (or should be) the foundation of everything. In a way, how can we discuss spirituality without an even basic understanding of our origin, our purpose, our destiny? How can we have a fulfilling life if in the very deep we are uncertain of what are we trying to accomplish? This text is the first of a series of texts that will address those questions and topics. They don’t have the pretension to carry all the right answers, but do attempt to address those questions from a spiritual, although down to earth perspective. In fact, one of my purposes while writing those texts is to deconstruct the idea that spirituality and reality are separate things. As we should expect, if science and spirituality are both real, they should complement and agree with each other, otherwise we have got something wrong somewhere, right?

                Science has already proved that matter and energy are related, in fact the equation E=mc2 is nowadays one of the most popularized equations of physics. But let’s explore this relationship a bit more. Matter is made of atoms, which are composed by a large eletrosphere and a nucleus. Most of the mass in every atom is in their nucleus, which occupy a minor portion of the entire atom’s volume. So, everything we interact with in the entire course of our lives, including our own physical bodies, is composed of atoms that are mostly “empty”. But we can go even deeper. What’s inside the nucleus? Protons and neutrons which can be further broken down into even smaller particles, known as quarks. And what’s a quark made of? Well, now we are really stretching our current scientific knowledge, but one of the most prominent theories proposes it is composed of energetic strings vibrating on very particular ways. In a way, it makes sense and agrees with the concept that matter and energy are related. So, when I think of what matter really is, I think about those energetic strings vibrating in every atom, holding the atom together and creating electromagnetic charges that makes atoms attract each other. When I think of what matter really is, I think of energy in a condensed state, which implies that my physical body is also composed of condensed energy.

Now stop and carefully think about this. Everything you see and touch is composed of energy in condensed state. Your physical body is composed of energy in condensed state. It is very tangible to you but, at the same time, it is simply composed of energy which, we can convene, is something generally impalpable. This seemingly contradiction holds what I believe to be an important lesson on spirituality: the difference between all physical natural phenomena and non-physical ones is simply on the vibrational quantum state of the energy. So, any physical natural phenomenon is simply a subgroup of all natural phenomena. Just because something does not express itself on a way we can perceive with our physical body (composed of what for the absence of technical vocabulary I call condensed energy) and current scientific apparatus, does not mean it isn’t real or non-natural. But wait, explain this better, you might say. What do you mean by “vibrational quantum state”? Think about those strings vibrating on a specific rate. All strings vibrating on the same rate would constitute matter as we know it. But wouldn’t there be the possibility for other vibrational rates? So, what if anything vibrating at a different rate constituted matter of a different nature than that we call matter? In this case, we wouldn’t be able to see it, touch it or interact with it by any other physical means. This is what I mean by different quantum states… we need to open our minds for the possibility of matter existing in forms we can’t readily perceive. And in this case, couldn’t the spiritual dimension simply be formed by this matter vibrating in a different quantum state? I think so and we have some spiritual communications that suggest this.  Now, note that this is a very simplistic explanation not supported by our current scientific understanding. I understand this, but have made a conscious choice not to limit myself to what can be proved in my lifetime. Besides, all the ideas I have developed here are in agreement with what we know to be scientifically true as well as common descriptions of facts and experiences accumulated over the centuries by many if not all civilizations. If you believe this is not correct, please feel free to share your comments with me. I say this not to protect the ideas I present, but to continue to encourage a curious and open minded exploration of greater truth and enlightenment. But let’s continue our discussions…

The scientific method utilizes hypothesis testing as one of its main tools to make scientific progress. This method is quite simple: an experiment is typically designed with the intent to reject a test hypothesis. When hypotheses cannot be rejected my multiple experiments performed by several scientists in multiple different places (maybe even different fields) and over a fair amount of time, it is somewhat elevated to a “theory” status and later on to a “law” status. But experiments do not confirm whether a test hypothesis is true or not; they simply indicates if the hypothesis can be rejected or not. So, in a way, much of our scientific progress depend on formulating explanations for our observations, proving them wrong and then changing them over and over until we can’t disprove them anymore. That’s what we call “truth”, scientifically speaking. What we consider to be “right” is simply what we could not prove to be “wrong”. So, why can’t we do the same with spirituality? Every effect has a cause. This is a basic rule of every science. Now, when have we determined that all effects must have a physical cause? Ruling out all non-physical effects as supernatural and explaining them as a delusion or hoax simply can’t constitute good reasoning. Phenomena such as psychokinesis, telepathy, precognition, clairvoyance or spirit communication, can and should be studied and understood the same way we do with psychology, philosophy and political sciences. They simply require alternative methodologies. What is the problem with this? The fact that we do not fully understand such phenomena at the present moment doesn’t mean they are delusional or inexistent.

I have made the choice to develop my own spiritual beliefs according to pragmatic principles. I do not take anything for granted and challenge every idea rationally, scientifically, empirically and historically. I have deep respect for every religion, but do not consider myself as a religious person as I have chosen to remain a free thinker. Spirituality for me cannot be a religion; it is a journey and not a destination. So, I strive to keep my own limitations in perspective and maintain my mind open, but free not to accept too quickly anything that isn’t rational or that disagrees with the accumulated knowledge pre-established. Spirituality does not need to be a fantasy and should not be relegated to a mystical or even irrelevant status because sooner or later we all know for fact that every single one of us is going to die. It’s probably the most certain thing in life! I am going to die and you will die as well. So, I don’t know about you, but I want to try to understand what it truly means a bit better – just as a good scientist would behave towards any other topic of study.

Skeptics to spiritual phenomena often ignore or deny the effect as to suppress the fact that a cause exists. It’s easier to pick a fraud and say the phenomena has been debunked, than to risk concluding we have missed a good deal of the universe in the big picture! But we must also ask ourselves if these debunked frauds are the rule or the exception. Can we confidently dismiss a large collection of the phenomena considered supernatural? Can we dismiss all accounts that, to the most part, have been described very similarly by different people from different cultures and for several centuries? Can we rationally dismiss all the non-physical phenomena that, sometimes and under special circumstances, can actually be perceived by our five basic senses? Can we simply rule out all of them? We just need to be honest with our own reasoning to arrive at the answer.

I believe that reducing our paradigms to what we know and can explain limits our ability of expression in the world. It curbs our connection with ourselves and with nature. The universe behaves the way it does regardless of whether we can explain it.  Gravity, for example, has always behaved the same way it does now. It does not depend on our ability to understand its cause and mechanisms. The same can be said for all other natural phenomena, including those we call supernatural due to our inability to comprehend them. Electromagnetism, thermodynamics, metaphysics, spiritual phenomena; all of those events have natural causes independent from our comprehension or acceptance. For a long time we could not see infrared radiation, but it has always been there. We also do not fully understand the mysteries behind intuition, but who have never experienced it? When we deny non-physical effects simply because we cannot experience them with our five basic senses, we are rebelling against nature and set ourselves apart from it. It is not a matter of faith, but of open mindedness. In my opinion, we must strive to honestly and rationally advance our understanding of ourselves and the universe around us from the stand point that we are also part of this nature, this universe. The excess is not on what we accept rationally, but on what we reject without questioning.

Accepting that our physical condition limits our ability to perceive our environment and that, for this very same reason, some consider certain phenomena as supernatural broaden our perspective of life. Suddenly, there is no need for miracles. No need for bending natural laws that govern the universe. The entire cosmos is perfect and we are in harmony with this perfection. Instead of imposing, out of pride and arrogance, what is “real” and what is “delusional”, we must accept nature for what it is. There is a reason why those who have realized their spiritual nature say they have passed through an awakening experience. They perceive the world beyond their five basic senses (or should we say in multiple quantum states?) and dare to be more than very intelligent animals endowed with organic life. They are not in conflict with the world as it is. If you are not awake about your true spiritual nature and harmonious connection with the universe yet, then the question is… for how long will you conscientiously rest asleep? Arriving at a place where we are genuinely honest and curious about ourselves and our universe is the first step for any further spiritual exploration. If you have got that you have understood our spiritual nature or are close to doing so. If you have got that, you are ready for the next point!